Siirry pääsisältöön

Guide to Information Seeking: Evaluating information

Evaluating information resources

When you look for sources to use in your studies or work, you should always evaluate their usefulness critically. By skimming the content, you can quickly see if the information presented is well-argued and accurate, i.e. if you can trust the content. In practice, you can evaluate printed and electronic sources with the same criteria.

When you use source materials, consider the following:

  • What type of publication is it – an expert/research article, dissertation, company website, news article, or something else? Company websites and news articles should be used with great caution as sources, because their authors often are not experts.
  • Is the source a scholarly/trade journal or a popular publication? If it is an article, has it been peer-reviewed? Trade journals can also be popular, but they usually meet other criteria for an expert article.
  • Is the publication independent and unbiased, or does it have commercial, political, or religious ties? Especially company websites are always commercial and their information should not be relied on. Publications by public authorities, research institutes, universities and professional, artistic, or scholarly associations are often reliable.
  • When was the source/publication published, is the information up to date? In some fields, information can become outdated in a decade.
  • Is the author of the publication an expert in the field and is the author’s background organisation (affiliation) mentioned? The accuracy of the author information increases the reliability of the source.
  • Is the publication original research (primary source), a review article or news about the research (secondary source)? Note that review articles written by experts are secondary sources, but almost as reliable as original articles.
  • Are the sources used in the publication indicated and are they marked appropriately? Do they seem reliable and relevant to the topic? Clear in-text citations and an extensive reference list / bibliography at the end increases the reliability of the publication.

Sources:
Haasio, A. 2020. Löydä! Helsinki: Avain.
Tampere University Library 2023. Information Searching Guide: Evaluating information. Accessed: https://libguides.tuni.fi/information-searching-guide/evaluation.

 

In information retrieval, it is important to be able to distinguish between scholarly, professional, and general/popular publications, so that their suitability can be evaluated, for example, as source material for a report, essay, or thesis.

General/Popular publications are, for example, magazines and newspapers. In these types of publications, the target audience is the general public. In magazines and newspapers, the writer is often a journalist instead of an expert, who either has or does not have expertise on the topic. Examples of general publications: Time magazine, The Guardian, Wired, National Geographic.

Trade journals are journals published by trade associations or universities of applied sciences, whose target audience are professionals in the field. The writer of trade publications is often a professional in the field, or sometimes a journalist who knows the field. The topics deal with current news and practical information from the field. Examples of trade journals: Nursing Outlook, The Journal of Marketing, The Journal of Engineering Education, and journals published by universities of applied sciences.

Scholarly journals are scholarly journals/periodicals (sometimes also called journals, peer reviewed journals, scientific journals), whose target audience is considerably smaller than the previous ones; mainly researchers, experts, and students in the field. The articles are based on research and the results gained from it, which can be very detailed/thorough. They can be identified, for example, by the following things:

  • The article is often peer reviewed, where one or more experts in the field evaluate the scientific quality and content of the article and modify it based on their comments before publication.
  • The article structure usually follows the formal IMRD structure. Following sections can be found in the article: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion or analysis of the results.
  • The author(s) is a researcher/expert and their background organisation is a well-known research institute or university/college.
  • The article uses sources extensively that are clearly marked as citations in-text and reference list / bibliography.

More information: https://libguides.tuni.fi/information-searching-guide/evaluation

 

A peer review or a referee process is an essential part of academic publishing. Before an article is published in a peer reviewed journal, it has been read and reviewed by experts in the relevant field. For example, phrasing of a question, research methods used and interpretation of the results are assessed in the peer review process. It also ensures that the text structure meets the requirements of scholarly writing. Reviewers recommend whether the article is ready to be published or not, and reviewers may suggest improvements to the text before the article can be published.

Peer review is thought to guarantee the quality of an article. You can refine your search in many databases so that the search result includes only peer reviewed articles. The used terms are e.g. scholarly, peer reviewed, research article, review article

An individual article may not provide information whether the article is peer reviewed or not. Information on peer review can be found on the home page of the journal. For example, the About the journal section on the Applied Nursing Research home page states that the journal is peer reviewed: "Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings...".

When using article search in Finna, narrow the search by clicking the box Peer reviewed:

Primary sources or original sources provide new information and give direct evidence on a topic. Primary sources include for example research articles and dissertations, where authors report their own research and its findings.

Secondary sources or second-hand sources discuss primary sources. Secondary sources comment on a research, evaluate, summarize or compare them, or draw conclusions from them. Secondary sources include for example news articles on a research, literature reviews, meta-analyses and textbooks.

Secondary sources include analysis and interpretation, and the contents of the primary source may become distorted. This does mean secondary sources are automatically unusable, but you should consider their usability along with other criteria. You may use for example a literature review published in a scholarly journal, where they draw together a number of research findings to summarize current knowledge on a topic. You can also use an article where the author summarizes the findings in his or hers dissertation. In contrast, you cannot use a newspaper article on a new research finding, but should seek out the original research.

See video about the difference between primary and secondary sources and ways to tell them apart:

Digital information literacy

The rapid development of the digital online environment has changed the way we search, analyse, use, and share information. Digital information literacy is the ability to access, manage, understand, integrate, communicate, evaluate, create, and disseminate information safely and appropriately through digital technologies. Digital information literacy highlights the importance of critical thinking and the ability to make informed assessments of all the information we find and use.

Types of information disorder

Identifying misinformation and disinformation is part of digital information literacy. To help us understand different dimensions of false content online, Claire Wardle and Hossein Derakhshan created a framework of information disorder. It makes a distinction between different types of content based on their intended purposes.

Reference: Digital Information Literacy Guide, p. 40

https://faktabaari.fi/dil/digital-information-literacy-guide.pdf

 

Reasons to spread false information

The amount of misinformation has increased in recent years. Reasons to spread false information are often ideological or political. Influencing through information is communication that aims to systematically influence public opinion, people's behaviour and decision-making, and thus society's ability to function. Reasons can also be commercial e.g., the intentional filtering of news to attract audiences or using clickbait to get as much visibility, likes, and shares.

Misinformation is believed because we tend to believe things that strengthen our existing world view. This tendency is called confirmation bias. At the same time, we reject things that challenge our preconceptions.

Combating misinformation

You can combat misinformation by learning to use fact checking tools and gaining a critical approach to sources. For fact checking you can, for example, use a lateral reading method, where a reader verifies the background information of what they have found online (reliability of source, facts, statistics, references) from different sites and sources before starting to read the text at hand.

How to spot misinformation:

  • Verify the information is correct from more than one source.
  • Consider whether someone benefits financially, politically, or through gaining followers or clicks.
  • Will I cause unnecessary panic or confusion if I share this information?

 

References

https://faktabaari.fi/dil/digital-information-literacy-guide.pdf
https://yle.fi/aihe/artikkeli/2021/02/08/valheenpaljastaja-kahdeksan-asiaa-jotka-jokaisen-pitaisi-ymmartaa
https://www.ifla.org/

 

About this guide

This guide aims to support Turku UAS students and staff in searching information. It is a major part of the study material in the Information Skills Online Course.

Do you need help?

Contact Library at the Turku University of Applied Sciences by email library@turkuamk.fi.

We are happy to help you!

How to spot fake news

Click image to enlarge.

Usage rights of the guide

Creative Commons -lisenssi
This publication has been licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license